Dammit Greg Couch, stop living in a golden era that only existed in your own mind!

>> Wednesday

Greg Couch of the Chicago Sun-Times wrote a truly stupifying piece yesterday. He says his attention was caught Sunday when three Americans won on the same day (Tiger Woods winning the British Open, Floyd Landis winning Le Tour, and James Blake beating Andy Roddick in some tennis tournament that only die-hard tennis enthusiasts would have heard of.)

He says these yankee triumphs are more the exception than the rule, citing American collapses in international competition over the past three years. He says the reason why American teams don't succeed any more is because kids don't have fun in sports.

Huh?

Let's for just a second assume he has successfully diagnosed the problem. If pressure has gotten to kids in sports over the last three decades, and winning has become the only objective, then it would seem to follow that the kids who survived little leagues and peewee leagues and Pop Warner would be the best equipped and talented (the ones where winning was constant and the game stayed fun), and the best-suited to pressure-filled situations. However, Couch's premise doesn't match his conclusion. If the best kids grew up to become the best athletes in an era where fun has lost its emphasis, wouldn't these athletes be dominating due to superior mental and physical superiority? Think about it for a second.

Likewise, hasn't the last 30 years or so seen the rise of the "participation trophy" and the mantra of "Everyone is a winner, we don't keep score?"

As if his faulty premises and ridiculous concusion weren't enough, Couch's argument straight-on contradicts itself later on. He says that after World War II and economic recovery in affected countries, more countries besides the United States were able to devote resources to training and scouting and generally equipping the world's best athletes for competition. However, this flat-out contradicts his earlier point, saying that kids need to learn to play the game informally and not be bogged down in the pressure situations of organized competition and instruction. He sarcastically refers to the addition of chalk lines and bases at the park where he used to play little league as "Improvements?". While Couch may have a point muddled in there somewhere, it's completely lost because he can't decide whether teams succeed by increased investment in better training or by less infrastructure and less instruction!

Couch also has very shaky ground to stand on when examining US successes and failures in international competition. "U.S. Soccer didn't win a game at the World Cup and lost to Ghana." The print edition of the Sun-Times carried a picture of Claudio Reyna and the words "Underachieved" under it. Underachieved? Not to anyone who's watched more than 20 minutes of soccer before in their lives. It doesn't take a full-blown soccer hooligan to know that the US hasn't really made a name for themselves in international competition. His assessment of Team USA's fortunes at the World Baseball Classic? He mentions that they lost to Canada. One tournament is enough to uproot the entire system and bring about a return to a golden age of pickup games and sandlot ball producing major leaguers.

His most egregious abuse of the facts was, "No Americans made the Wimbledon quarterfinals."
This is just flat out wrong, as in 2006, Americans took second in mixed doubles and won Mens' doubles. Even if he wants to apply this categorization to the singles competitors only, one year of shortcoming in Couch's mind is enough to erase the fact that 11 of the last 16 Ladies' finalists have been Americans. On the Mens' side, 13 of the last 30 finalists have been Americans. The next closest country has FOUR of the last 30, and he just happens to be a player named Roger Federer. You might have heard of him. He's been the number one player in the world for the last two years.

He says "we hear less about American sports successes than about the fattening of America." But news reports contain reports on the growing childhood obesity epidemic and ways to lose weight seemingly constantly. Of course we're going to hear less about American success in international competitions that sometimes only come once every four years.

Remember why he wrote this article in the first place? Because of Tiger, Floyd and the other guy all winning on the same day. Tiger Woods's dad started teaching him how to play golf when he was three and won the Junior World Golf Championships when he was 9. Somehow intense instruction and worldwide competition didn't seem to keep him from succeeding on an international stage. Maybe he'd be winning every tournament if he only focused on having fun as a kid. Floyd Landis was named junior national champion at age 17. Somehow competition was able to work for him. As for tennis, while I can't find anything on this guy, past champions Venus and Serena Williams began winning tournaments when they were barely older than toddlers.

He also cites examples of the demise of fun by observing kids saying "we won we won" during the end-of-game handshake in a little league game as if this were something new. I know I can remember saying that in the handshake line for little league. It didn't happen often because my team always sucked (total coincidence when paired with my general sucking at baseball). While power-mad parents heckling kids and putting intense pressure on them are out there, and even on the rise perhaps, they remain the exception to the rule.

But of course if we all played hooky from school, walked through the fence with the loose board in it, threw down some old newspapers for bases and just played pickup, sandlot ball all day, Americans would dominate international competition. Not friggin likely Greg. So put your shoebox full of baseball cards away and stop reminiscing about a golden age that only existed in your own mind and on the Little Rascals.

4 comments:

Vinnie 8:47 PM  

Actually, "we don't keep score" is a forced ambivalence that youth leagues use to make sure kids and parents don't murder each other over a 5&under t-ball league games. If people were in control when it comes to competition, the notion would never have been introduced.

Again, the participation trophy is only a last-ditch effort to remind tiny, impressionable kids with their whole life ahead of them that losing doesn't make them the worthless waste of space that some of their teammates' parents and coaches believe them to be.

"If pressure has gotten to kids in sports over the last three decades, and winning has become the only objective, then it would seem to follow that the kids who survived little leagues and peewee leagues and Pop Warner would be the best equipped and talented (the ones where winning was constant and the game stayed fun), and the best-suited to pressure-filled situations."

...That doesn't make sense.

"If the best kids grew up to become the best athletes in an era where fun has lost its emphasis, wouldn't these athletes be dominating due to superior mental and physical superiority? Think about it for a second."

...I did, and I don't think I agree. Enjoyment has a positive effect on one's work no matter what it is. If someone enters a field deprived of enjoyment and can merge a singular feeling of enjoyment with talents on par with their peers, they have an edge.

You're too much of a capitalist. All I can hear is the logic of "If this other dude gets more goods, I get less." A spirit of competition mixed with a desire to embiggen (for lack of a real word) one's opponent benefits every participant more than a spirit of cut-throat competition that treats competitors--and even teammates--as a threat to one's own success.

You should go to church more.

Vinnie 8:52 PM  

Also, you're forgetting that our own childhood most definitely falls within this era, if you will, of over-wrought, over-specialized, formalized youth sports. Really, ever since widespread free agency hit sports, we've regarded every athlete, no matter how young, as a free agent. And it frankly it sickens me. And I don't envy pro athletes because I know I wouldn't have fun doing what they do.

Anonymous,  3:41 PM  

Great site loved it alot, will come back and visit again.
»

Anonymous,  12:49 AM  

Keep up the good work. thnx!
»

Post a Comment

NSAwins is a popular site for daily vegas sports odds including updated Vegas Super Bowl Odds and weekly NFL totals and odds during football season. Check out NSAwins during March Madness for FREE March Madness Brackets to Print and Expert Picks on the NCAA Tournament. NSAwins also offers HUGE 100% BetUs Bonus Code and BoDog Bonus Code sportsbook promos.
Online Casino Reports - Online Gambling Guide and Directory for casinos, poker and sports betting.

Get out of your yellow chairs and onto some treadmills to train like a pro.

Check out Casino Guide Canada for free NFL online betting picks and the best online casinos for Canadian and US players today!
USA Online Casino guides you not only to casino bonus, but odds of sportsbook for online sports betting. Try your luckiness today to enjoy gaming games on the internet.

Blog Archive

Try GP sports for luscious sports betting games in a stylish setting. Play to your heart's content and be in with the chance of winning big!

  © Blogger template Webnolia by Ourblogtemplates.com 2009

Back to TOP