This is dumb.
>> Monday
If you're keeping track, this gives me two vaguely sports-related, barely-a-post posts in less than twenty minutes. But to reiterate the title, this is dumb. I don't know much about economics, but I take this as the stock market equivalent of "The ___s are # and # vs. the ____s in games decided by # points or less in ___ Stadium since 19__."
Also note that there are four--count 'em--four hokey bull-bear plays on the page by the end of the second sentence.
Yeah. Dumb.
1 comments:
"Assuming there's any validity to the indicator, (a big assumption, admittedly) part of the problem with it in recent years is that in five of the last seven Super Bowls, one of the teams either was formed after the 1970 NFL-AFL merger or changed its name in a post-merger relocation...But that caveat may not be as much of an issue this year."
So let's recap.
1.) AFL-NFL merger in 1970.
2.) Baltimore Colts move to Indianapolis in 1984.
3.) Indicator hasn't worked the past few years because one of the teams had a new name or relocated after 1970.
4.) But this year it shouldn't matter.
Got it.
Post a Comment