As Homer says. EURO 2008 gets underway June 7 with co-hosts Austria and Switzerland providing the stadiums, the chocolate, and the lederhosen. The EURO is like the World Cup, but as its name implies, just for Europe. While seemingly offering little that the World Cup doesn't offer, it can often be the more thrilling of the two competitions, and heroes and goats are made just as easily. (David Beckham at EURO 2004 comes to mind.)
3 comments:
Wow, could those predictions be any more conservative? "Have the talent to get out of group, but a title run would be a stretch"? "Will do damage before it's done"? Who's in the "May have a chance to potentially be competetive" category? You are truly a gambling man.
And by the way, a job is no excuse for posting less. In fact, I demand that you post more often once you start. Nights, weekends, holidays... whatever it takes. I don't care how much more those other guys are paying you--this blog is your real job!
Yea, admittedly it's splitting hairs as to who's a "dark horse" and who "has talent, but a title run is unlikely," which in many circles is the definition of a dark horse.
I suppose what I was looking to get across is that of the 16 teams in the tournament, every one deserves to be there. It's not like the World Cup where Germany runs Saudi Arabia off the field with an 8-0 whipping. Games like that make people question what the loser was even doing on the same field as the winner.
In EURO 2004, only four games out of 31 featured margins of victory greater than 2 goals. Greece won the tournament with a goal differential of +3 over 6 games. Runner-up Portugal had a goal difference of +2. So if distinctions appear minute, it's largely because they are.
2 things-
You suck for not picking Poland.
You suck for not mentioning Torres in your Spain paragraph.
FERNANDO TORRES LIVERPOOL'S NUMBER NINE...
Post a Comment